Decoding defamation: Analysis of Archbishop Makarios vs. ‘Orthodoxos Typos’

·

By Ilias Karagiannis

The legal dispute in the case (4726/2023) between Archbishop Makarios of Australia and the Greek newspaper, Orthodoxos Typos, was recently finalised in the Greek courts.

Following the final verdict, both Orthodoxos Typos and the Greek Orthodox Archdiocese of Australia released their version of events. In an era where the credibility of media worldwide is being eroded, The Greek Herald has since accessed the court decision and explored the case to present its own factual analysis for readers.

Defamation dispute begins:

The case began with publications by Orthodoxos Typos about four years ago. The reports were directed against Archbishop Makarios and led to the filing of a lawsuit against the newspaper.

In the court of first instance, Orthodoxos Typos was convicted and ordered to pay 10,000 euros in damages. An appeal was filled, which was heard in July 2023 in Greece’s Court of Appeal, with the decision not being handed down until January 2024.

The Greek Herald gained access to the appeal court’s decision.

orthodoxos typos
The legal dispute in the case (4726/2023) between Archbishop Makarios of Australia and the Greek newspaper, Orthodoxos Typos, was recently finalised in the Greek courts.

The content published in both the printed and online versions of Orthodoxos Typos were considered to go beyond what is objectively necessary to protect legitimate interest and constitute an insult to the personality of the plaintiff Archbishop Makarios.

In more detail, the appellate court initially determined that the statements contained in the publications lacked the essential elements of the offence of defamation, since they are based on true facts.

Also included in the same publications are sharp criticisms, which are inherent in the press’s mission, but also anticipated given the plaintiff’s status as Archbishop.

Subsequently, however, the court pointed out that within the publications, there are judgments and expressions that were unnecessary to convey the criticism. These elements are what suggest that Archbishop Makarios was insulted, and his personality was diminished by Orthodoxos Typos.

The court found the use of vulgar and highly derogatory expressions and parallels against Archbishop Makarios – which were not objectively necessary – were chosen deliberately to insult the honour and reputation of the Archbishop. This was evident in the mocking style adopted by the author of the relevant publications. The court said they were not appropriate for an ecclesiastical, non-satirical newspaper whose purpose is the spiritual edification of its readers and not to ridicule and insult.

Moreover, it was determined that the publications, known to an unspecified but substantial audience, predominantly comprising readers of the mentioned newspaper, both in Greece and internationally, insulted the Archbishop’s character.

These publications caused significant distress and anxiety to the Archbishop, prompting him to become wary even of his simple statements, for fear they might be deliberately misinterpreted and used to degrade and insult him.

Considering the circumstances outlined, the court awarded an amount of EUR 5,000 to compensate the non-pecuniary harm endured by the Archbishop due to the aforementioned violation of his character. Archbishop Makarios had initially sought an amount of 260,000 euros.

Archbishop Makarios of Australia in Constantinople for launch of his new book. Photo VEMA.
Archbishop Makarios of Australia was seeking 260,000 euros in compensation.

The payment:

Looking deeper at the topic of financial compensation by the Orthodoxos Typos to Archbishop Makarios, the court of first instance originally awarded 10,000 euros. This decision was overturned by the appeals court and instead awarded the Archbishop 5,000 euros.

“In order to compensate for the non-pecuniary damage suffered by the applicant as a result of the abovementioned infringement of his personality, he must be awarded the sum of 5,000 euros,” the judgment said.

What did the Archbishop gain?

In addition to the 5,000 euros for compensation, Archbishop Makarios, through his legal action, managed to have Orthodoxos Typos remove the articles against him published on 3 February 2020, 14 February 2020, 21 February 2020, 2 March 2020, 13 March 2020, 3 April 2020 and 8 April 2020.

The newspaper was mandated to include a summary of the court’s ruling in the location where the articles were originally published. If it did not publish the decision summary, there was a penalty payment in favour of the applicant of EUR 100 for each day of delay.

Finally, the Orthodoxos Typos was ordered to partially pay Archbishop Makarios’ legal costs of both instances, which were set at 1,000 euros.

What’s next?

This is not the first and won’t be the last defamation case Archbishop Makarios is taking to the courts. The Archbishop has also filed lawsuits in Greece and Australia against:

  • The ecclesiastical website Exapsalmos/exapsalmos.gr and its head Sotiris Tzoumas, also for “defamation” and “insult to personality” with a claim for compensation amounting to 250,000 euros.
  • The Greek Australian journalist Vasso Morali for posts on her personal Facebook profile with a claim for compensation amounting to one million euros.
  • Athens lawyer (and nephew of the late Archbishop Stylianos of Australia) Nikolaos D. Kalliouris, also for “defamation,” with a claim for compensation amounting to 300,000 euros.
  • Greek journalist Alkis Morelas for a series of publications about the works Archbishop Makarios and his associates.

Advertisement

Share:

KEEP UP TO DATE WITH TGH

By subscribing you accept our Terms of Service and Privacy Policy.

Advertisement

Latest News

Dr Christos Theologos: ‘Dance keeps us bound to our roots, from Chios to Sydney’

As part of the Zeibekiko Festival Australia, respected folklorist Dr Christos Theologos will lead a series of lectures and workshops.

South Melbourne turns to supporters ahead of Australian Championship kick-off

The opening clash of the Australian Championship will be an event shaped by the voices of the fans themselves.

Low birth rates and ageing: The silent enemy of the Greek nation

From the late 1990s it had become clear to Greek demographers and social scientists that the number of births in Greece was falling.

Peta Trimis: The new star of Australian football with a Hellenic soul

At just 19 years old, Peta Trimis is already being hailed as one of the brightest young stars of Australian football.

A second chance at life: Angelo Alateras’ journey from mechanical heart to transplant hope

After years on life support, 80kgs lost, and 615 days of physio, Angelo finally received the gift of a new heart.

You May Also Like

Tsindos: The legendary Greek tavern of Lonsdale Street in Melbourne

Tsindos is a legendary Greek tavern located on Lonsdale Street, Melbourne.

Xenophon Zolotas: The politician who gave speeches in English using Greek words

Greek politician and economist, Xenophon Zolotas, gave historical speeches in English but using Greek words.

Prominent poet Katerina Anghelaki-Rooke dies, aged 81

Acclaimed Greek poet and translator Katerina Anghelaki-Rooke died on Tuesday, aged 81. Anghelaki-Rooke was born in Athens in 1939 and studied in Athens, France and...